Arsenal and Barcelona: Coinage of the Week by a Foreign Journalist

A haughty Spaniard

Some obscene gestures

Today we continue yesterday’s theme of matters lost in translation – and if you haven’t seen it, yesterday’s post Phallocephaloid of the Week is considerably more scurrilous than today’s, includes speculation on a famous Norwegian’s menstrual cycle, and is therefore recommended.

This week’s prize for enriching the language goes to Argentine publication Olé (you couldn’t make it up, could you?) who, reporting on the goals heard across the world (Arsenal 2 Barcelona 1 this Wednesday past), gave us the headline Arselona. They added:

“Victory was the justification of a lifetime.  Arsenal beat Barcelona playing as they always seek to: like Barcelona.  A Spanish team was dominated by its double.”  (1)

Arselona probably sounds good in Spanish, though in English (sadly not in American) it sounds enjoyably rude.  After all, Tottenham supporters – who hate Arsenal with the visceral viciousness of the second best – refer to their north London rivals as “The Arse”.

You can just about get away with the arse syllable when it is part of a word (like arsenic or arsenal) – though something tickling at the back of your mind always goes “arse” when you hear a word like that, just as the anus always springs out of the name Zanussi and the C word out of Scunthorpe – but you can’t get away with it in invented words.  Foreigners, whose sadly restricted linguistic skills prevent them from recognising that arse is rude, don’t get it – hence an entertaining coinage like Arselona, which does sound (and mfk is genuinely sorry but can’t resist it) like a gay republic.  Indeed, foreigners whose names begin with arse flock to become associated with Arsenal if they have the talent.  Mfk  thinks of the great Arsène Wenger, who almost is Arsenal now, and the erratically brilliant Russian winger Andrei Arshavin.  No matter that the vertically gifted Arsène resembles one of the storks from his native Alsace and can probably look in through people’s upstairs windows, while the vertically challenged Arshavin’s arse grazes the turf when he runs – both were drawn to Arsenal, at least partly, for the sympathetic euphony of the name.

The word arse has been around in English since at least 1000 AD – when it appeared as ars, ears or ers – and very probably before.  Geoffrey Chaucer (14th century) renders it erse (pronounced arse).  What possessed North America to change it to ass, as though one were sitting on a donkey rather than a pair of usually flabby cheeks, is beyond mfk.  If anyone can explain this bizarre switch from a strong sound that can be relished in the mouth (sorry for any unfortunate images conjured there) to a weak one, please do.  It is a mystery.

Arsène, incidentally, is none too pleased when his maturing wonderteam is compared to Barcelona, pointing out pettishly (and with duplicitously skilled French disingenuity) that he has been teaching Arsenal to play that way for thirteen years while Pep Guardiola has only been developing the style of Barcelona for two or three.  Wenger is infuriated whenever Arsenal are described as Barcelona lite – which they often are by journalists too lazy or dim to think with depth or originality – and mfk can see why he would react like that while simultaneously advising him to take the intended compliment.  Barcelona are the best team in the world, as Wenger himself keeps repeating (more disingenuity), and when people compare Arsenal to Barcelona what they mean is that these are the two teams, of all the teams on the planet, that are the most enjoyable to watch.

Human-stork hybrid Arsène may not be best pleased by Olé’s suggestion that his team played like Barça’s double, but he should take the intended compliment gracefully and not have one of his hissy fits – because time will tell.  The point is that his team of precocious embryos and under-11’s is finally maturing into something nearly as good as Barcelona (and only superficially similar, as you point out Arsène, but that’s not the point) and may even be on the cusp of being as good, or even better.  It has been a long term project and he has stuck to his gunners against a firestorm of ignorant criticism with obsessive single-mindeness.  This explains the touchiness, but he should have taken more note of Olé’s comment “Victory was the justification of a lifetime”.  They do get it, Arsène, and they do appreciate what you have achieved.

The rest of the world – with one notable exception that we shall come to shortly – gets it too.  Italy’s La Gazetta, for example, called it thus:

“A night of Arsenal in their purest form: quality plus courage plus adrenaline.  Arsenal are now very close to the Catalans, both in terms of talent and organisation.”

Brazil’s Lance will also not have upset Wenger:

“Barça’s big players were overshadowed and will have an extremely complicated mission in Spain.  Arsenal seem more mature than before.”

Nor will South Africa’s The Times have offended:

“Wenger insisted all along that his side would be true to their instincts and seek to fight fire with fire.  At the Emirates they proved as good as their word.”

Holland’s De Telegraaf was as nationalistically one-eyed as a relatively small country is entitled to be:

“Robin van Persie was again the difference for Arsenal”,

but otherwise they echoed the general tone.  And so on round the planet, except …

You know when you look at a satellite photograph of the Earth at night you see huge blazes of light (all those Mormons in Utah and northern Arizona for example), with less blazing but consistent light in most places, and then a few areas like the Amazonian rain forest or sub-Saharan Africa were there seems only stygian blackness?  Well, in terms of objective appreciation of the Arsenal performance, Spain alone was a huge dark blot on the sparkling planetary map.

This is excellent news for Spain.  Still drunk with Quixotic glory on returning home from the recent World Cup Finals with the golden bauble, their football has become less and less interesting.  Apart (Arsenal excepted) from Barça’s most watchable football on the planet and the perpetually entertaining sideshow of José Mourinho and his shenanigans at Real Madrid, the whole tippy-tappy edifice has been getting duller.

In truth, you would have to be Sepp Blatter or Spanish to believe that winning the World Cup means you are the best.  It usually means you’re quite good, or at least effective, but that’s not the same thing at all.  The truth is that Spain weren’t the best in 2010 or 2006 – and if you don’t believe me, look at the Sepp tables for those years (accessible via the geekbar at the top of this blog) and mfk’s analysis of what those tables reveal.

In 2006, when the Spanish came 22nd equal with Costa Rica, mfk remarked:

“Spain were the biggest disappointment of the Finals, merely scoring a second place in the Best Team category, two appearances in the Best Match category, and two nominations for Tragic Hair.  This was a sadly conventional and football-oriented performance by the Spanish, and I think we will all expect better of them in four years time.”

They were indeed better in 2010, but not the best (See Who Won the World Cup?, 25 July 2010).  They came third, not first as they appeared to think, and mfk had this to say:

“Judge for yourself, reader, whether Spain did indeed improve … or whether they just got lucky and Spanish lack of imagination actually became more extreme.  Just see what happens to their placing next time when they don’t win the Fifa thing.  They have nothing to fall back on, no strength in depth, and have all their huevos in a single canasta.  Sad, narrow and limited.  Mfk suggests that their best bet for developing into a serious football power will be to build on their natural strengths of haughtiness and obscene hand gestures, but will they listen?  The future for Spanish football cannot be considered bright.”

Well the penny seems finally to have dropped.  Italy remain several streets ahead of their latin cousins in the matter of obscene hand gestures, but Spanish haughtiness is resurgent.   Way to go, Spain.

The exceptions prove the rule.  The main Spanish organ out of step appears to be El Pais, which is disturbingly objective:

“Wenger’s kids have got better and better, they have lost their respect for Barcelona.  Arsenal have stopped being the best losers, the ideal opposition for Barcelona.  They fought like champions.”

Hmmm.  Marca is also rather disappointingly fair in its comments, praising Wilshere, Nasri, Walcott and Arshavin.  But don’t worry.  El Mundo places the blame for Barça’s defeat squarely on the shoulders of coach Guardiola – he made a defensive substitution when Barça were 1-0 up (Keita for Villa) and otherwise Barça would have strolled to their victory:

“A fatal decision.  Pep got it wrong.”

That’s more like it.  Arsenal weren’t better than Barça and were given victory rather than winning it.

Mfk has saved the best for last.  The aptly named AS (yes, it really is pronounced arse) pontificates straight from a fantasy world – the 1970s – in which English footballers are berserk warrior thugs who crash into their opponents, boot long balls agriculturally up field where they can be lashed into the net by a skill-free but hulking centre forward, and in which superior latin technique gets defeated (unfairly, it goes without saying) by ‘English spirit’:

“Barça kept the ball, but not with the fighting spirit which characterises wounded teams.  And a wounded Englishman is very dangerous.  It turned out that power, in the end, overcame technique.”

Power overcame technique?  What were they on?  The rest of us saw a game in which technique took on technique and the less arrogant of the two teams won.  The haughtiness of the AS attitude is world class.  Well done at last!  This is proper football culture.  Hope for Spain after all.

In case you don’t know enough to perceive just how haughty-beyond-reality AS is, allow mfk to point out that there weren’t too many Englishmen on display (two to be precise – less than 20% of the Arsenal team – Wilshere, who is more boy than man, and Walcott who is a little ahead of him and has recently started to shave) and the Arsenal goals were scored by, er, a Dutchman and a Russian.  Be aware also that Arsenal players are renowned for their technique and absolutely famous for their disdain for the traditional English hoof-and-hack approach.

Here’s the truth.  Barça are still more technically skilled than Arsenal overall and have (possibly) the three best players in the world in Messi, Iniesta and Xavi, but the gap is now narrow and Arsenal’s different style and wonderful audacity and team spirit put an overconfident Barça , deceived by their own hype, on their arses.  It took luck as well as courage and skill, but courage and skill earn any luck that assists them.

Both Xavi and Guardiola continued the fantasy in sour, flight-from-reality, post-match interviews.  The upshot was that Barça were simply miles better, had actually (apart from the scoreline) won the game convincingly and comprehensively (Pep even said “You don’t understand how difficult it is to come away from home and play like we did”);  Arsenal were practically beneath their aristocratic notice, and the result was an aberration like a zit on the face of a supermodel.

Playing to their national strengths at last, sighs the neutral observer with exquisite appreciation and pleasure.  All we needed was accompanying obscene hand gestures to make the transformation complete.  Spain are at last on an upward curve toward football greatness.  There is hope for them at the international tournament finals of 2012 and 2014.
And what hope for Arsenal (or Assenal as they are presumably known in the US)?  Some is the answer.  Canny old man-stork Arsène continues to repeat that Barça remain favourites in the tie over two matches.  If Barça are as overconfident as they sound, that’s Arsenal’s best hope and Wenger will fuel it all he can.  He knows – and Barça need to remember – that pride goeth before a fall and a proud heart before contumely.  Of course, if they do get things in perspective they retain sufficient overwhelming talent to kick Assenal’s asses – but it’s no longer a sure thing.

One thing is for sure.  If you have the merest grain of intelligence in an otherwise junkfood and Twitter clouded brain, you will not miss the second leg at the Camp Nou (or the Nou Camp as the English broadcasters are educationally subnormal and insular enough to style it).  Follow the sage advice of France’s L’Equipe:

“Keep the evening of 8 March free!”

(1) Mfk is indebted to The Guardian for this and other translations.

Mfk regrets that two posts on two successive days does not herald a return to daily posts.  There is more to life than sending rude words into cyberspace.  But now that he’s over his post-World-Cup inertia, he will continue to write every now and then about anything that is important and/or entertains him

And – now that myfriendkeith is including pictures – he is truly sorry if he has breached anyone’s copyrightHe has assumed from where he found the picture that it’s not in copyright or that you don’t care.  But if you do, just let him know and he will instantly take down anything he shouldn’t have appropriated.  He may be both an ass and an arse, but there is little harm in him.

Posted in Arsenal, Barcelona, La Liga, Real Madrid, The Sepps | Leave a comment

Phallocephaloid of the Week

 

John Carew receiving love

Still numb from bitter realisation that there is no truth in thrilling rumours of Liverpool FC plans to sign Rod Fanni and Ricky van Wolfswinkel as the nucleus of a new Porn Star Name XI coming shortly (sorry – could have phrased that better) to an English Premier League near you (1), mfk is sadly consoling himself at the prospect of tomorrow’s FA Cup tie between Leyton Orient and Arselona (2), likely to feature Orient players Mpoku and Cox.

Unless you have been stupid enough to subscribe to ESPN, you will be unable to watch Orient-Arselona on TV in the country where the match is played (3), ESPN not only perpetually failing to grasp the culture of “soccer” but also being dogs in the manger.  Despair not.  A commentary featuring the names Mpoku and Cox will have greater purity on the radio – pictures would just be distracting.

Mfk digresses.  The point of today’s post – and a very important point it is – is, despite bitter disappointment at Liverpool’s loss of courage in the Porn Star market, to mark the restoration of mfk’s faith in the phallocephalism of today’s elite footballer.   Step forward into the spotlight world class phallocephaloid John Carew, the counterintuitively Norwegian (fathered by a visiting GI called John Carew – now pronounced Careff by his more famous and much richer Scandinavian byblow), hulking striker, recently found washed up on a beach by Tony Pulis (4) at Stoke City.

Careff – or Carew as he is known in England, where football broadcasters pronounce Clichy as cliché – has not only gone and got himself another tattoo in the tasteful manner we so admire in today’s sporting heroes, but has actually outBeckhamed the inky-skinned Beckham himself.

Goldenballs, you will recall if alive and breathing on 28 November 2000, had his wife’s name tattooed on his arm in Hindi (he thought it would be “less tacky”) but alas, the editor of Hindi language magazine Purvai, one Pademesh Gupta, pointed out that the tattoo contains a “silly mistake” and actually says Vihctoria.

 

Dhavid's Tattoo

It was an enjoyable story, but no more than we might have expected from the denser half of celebrity couple Thick and Thin, who probably spells his wife’s name that way anyway while moving his lips.  No one bends it like Beckham – but now Carew has.  All hail Carew.

His latest piece of tat too was meant to say (in French – you see the trap? – stick to your own ‘language’, boys) My Life My Rules (unpunctuated, but you can’t have everything).
In French this would be Ma Vie Mes Règles – but what Carew actually now has on his hulking arm is Ma Vie Mes Régles.  The difference, if you have little French, may seem small – but the meaning of the stylish inking now changes to My Life My Menstrual Cycle.  In permanent ink.

 

Carew's blue period

This is a piece of genius by Carew – outBeckhaming Beckham is pretty impressive for a footballer of his limited but unquestionably hulking abilities – unless, of course, he is trying to tell us something.

Hitherto, Carew has been pictured with a succession of meretricious young women.  It has appeared that he changes them more frequently than his socks, and this has given the impression of an Andy-Gray-style libido and attitude to the better sex – but could it be that they have been rotated with such frequency to prevent them from discovering what has so far been his secret?  Does Carew in fact crave interaction of a different nature, and has he begun surgical steps towards his goal?  It would be disappointing if so, because it would render him less phallocephalic than deserving of our understanding and encouragement as he resolutely pursues his eyewatering odyssey, with the love and support of all who care for him, toward becoming the true, sensitive self imprisoned in the body of a hulking, misunderstood Norwegian.  Mfk resolutely refuses to believe it, but of course he has a vested interest in phallocephalism.  A photograph of Carew receiving love from a team mate is provided at the top of this post so that you may judge for yourself.

 

John Carew celebrating his victory over Gabriel Abonglahor in a game of stone-paper-scissors

(1) Liverpool now being owned by people who cannot even spell the word socks, it is widely believed that the rumours were started by a certain Dr Spooner who understandably read the name Red Sox as Rod Sex and repeated this in the hearing of some rumourmonger journalists.  More astute observers are instead closely watching the transfer policy of West Ham United, now owned by geriatric porn-to-crotchless-knickers-to-dildo magnates Sullivan and Gold – because if anyone’s going to build a Porn Star XI we need surely look no further than these two ‘fit and proper’ (according to the English FA) owners.  Don’t hold out too much hope, however, for spelling is not the strongest skill associated with West Ham.  CEO Karren Brady, employed by said pornsters and thus happy to rub shoulders (and we hope that’s all) with notorious exploiters of women as sexual objects, recently criticised the accidentally on-air sexism of Andy Gray and Richard Keys at lovable Sky Sports by referring to the soon-to-be-fired pair as “dinasaurs”.  Seemed a bit harsh given her employers’ greater chronological proximity to the Jurassic and the fact that Gray and Keys, despite their many failings, have yet to make millions from their unfashionable habit of objectifying women, but at least it demonstrated that it is not just Karen that she cannot spell.  Lack of strength in the spelling department may not be a handicap if she can find a player called Cumming, but may well prevent her from spotting the potential of a Quim or a Dong.

(2) See tomorrow’s post Coinage of the Week By A Foreign Journalist (if reading this today, go to View and click on the  Tardis function).

(3) Unless you resort to an illegal live feed from a swarthy, foreign source.  Go on: you won’t get caught, and it might hasten the overdue departure of the imperialist ESPN back to its comfort zone of a land where people engage in strange minority sports that all seem to demand the wearing of comedy underwear.

 

Sport being played in comedy underwear

(4) As Lady Bracknell would undoubtedly have put it: “To be appointed manager at Stoke City might be regarded as misfortune, but to couple that with the dress sense of an idiot being taken on an outing by a volunteer smacks of carelessness”.

 

Pulis and friend on outing

 

Posted in Arsenal, Aston Villa, David Beckham, Dickheads, English Premier League, John Carew, Liverpool, Stoke City, Tattoos, West Ham United | Leave a comment

There is a God

Mfk breaks silence at last with uncontainable news.  Under the headline Hodgson Eyes Up Fanni (and there’ll be plenty more like that if it’s true), London’s Daily Mirror claims seventies refugee Roy ‘Rodin’s Thinker’ Hodgson plans to replace bighead Glen Johnson with …. the man with a better name than Jan Vennegoor of Hesselinck … the man with the best porn star name since David Seaman … the commentator’s nightmare … the one and only … Rod Fanni!

See post of June 5, 2010 Spoilsport Frenchman Ruins World Cup for full implications of this thunderbolt.

| Leave a comment

Who Won The World Cup?

Well it wasn’t Africa, was it?

Some would say Sepp Blatter and Fifa with its £2bn tax-free profit.  Some would say the Spanish conquistadores at £500,000 a man for their 1-0 matador victory over the murderously charging toros of the Netherlands.  Some would say Slovenia and New Zealand for being there at all.  And there will be many other answers, none including the Indonesian sweatshop workers who made those Jabulani balls for a daily wage less than the price of a waist-enhancing, sugar-overdosing burger or soda exclusively sold by Fifa’s warm and loving “football family”.

And they’d all be talking through the back of their trousers, for the coveted  Sepp awards 2010 are now final and the league table* shows clearly and beyond conceivable doubt the identity of the runaway winners and football champions of planet Earth.

*  At any point where you get bored during this commentary, you can scroll down to find the league table at the end.

Some talk of Alexander,
And some of Hercules,
Of Hector and Lysander,
And such great names as these,
But of all the world’s great heroes
There’s none that can compare
With a tow, row, row, row, row, row, row,
To ….

Argentina!

The facts speak for themselves.  No one can argue with the facts.  No one can argue with the comprehensive victory of the boys from the pampas who finished a whole lap ahead of the futilely chasing pack.  68 points they amassed – 68!  It is hardly worth paying attention to the neck-and-neck sprint to the line for second place, for by the time France (55 points) pipped Spain (54 points) for that honour the crowd had long since packed up and gone home, leaving only a detritus of Macdonalds wrappers, Pepsi-cola cartons, and broken dreams (though no broken vuvuzelas, for they are indestructible and will be the only thing left on planet Earth when all other traces of human habitation have finally disappeared).

Now before you say all this is nonsense, just consider how the Sepps take every single feature that entertains us into account.  You don’t emerge as “world champions” because you narrowly won a scrappy, bad-tempered final match that disappointed nearly everyone who failed to appreciate that whatever the World Cup final is about, it isn’t entertainment.  You emerge as world champions because you earned that title by excelling in all aspects of footballing performance.  Because you rewarded us when we watched you and repaid our reasons for tuning in.  Because you gave us something to laugh at.  Because you were brilliant.

The full list of the 38 (count them – 38!) Sepp categories may be found in the previous post on this site The Sepp Awards: World Cup 2010 (or you can click on The Sepps on the geekbar above to get all the facts and figures, including the final nominations and winners).  But to cut to the chase, here is how the final ranking was determined.

First the 4 categories for commentators were discarded: they appeared in 2010 as an experimental side event, outside the main competition, and represented only commentator achievement in the country where the Sepp panel watched the finals.  While commentators and sofa-esconced pundits definitely contribute significantly to the totality of our experience, for good or ill, that experience will have been different everywhere.  No one for example, on the channels mfk watched, shouted Gooooooooooooooooooooooooooooool!  Gol, gol, gol, gol, gol, gol, gol, gol, gol, gol, gol, gooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooool!” or broke up in hysterics because one of the German players was called Butt.  (Mfk chooses these examples because that is exactly what he once heard two Hispanic commentators do – and how much more entertaining it would be if commentators everywhere had the sense to behave in this manner).

In the remaining 34 categories: 10 points were given for a win, 6 for coming second, 3 for coming third, and 1 for a nomination.  The results – as you will agree when you look at them – are 100% accurate and, unlike the preposterous Fifa rankings, represent the actual state of world football.

Perhaps the most impressive of Argentina’s achievements is their success across the board.  It seems astonishing, given how far ahead of the rest they finished, that they won only one Sepp (Team Award for Girliest Hair).  Beyond this, they finished runners-up in an unprecedented 7 categories and came third in three more (second and third for Most Homoerotic Goal Celebration).  This shows not only the breadth of their achievement but how all members of the squad contributed.  If you had to pick one stand-out it would be coach Diego Maradona who led inspirationally from the front, singlehandedly amassing 19 of his country’s 68 points and illustrating Argentina’s all-round game and versatility by finishing as runner-up in no fewer than 3 categories.

How curious, incidentally, that – while he has been voted the greatest player who ever lived (which actually means the greatest player in the voters’ fairly short lifetimes and even briefer memories, but is none the less impressive), it was not till he became a coach that his true glory days arrived.  His previous highest Sepp tally was his 10 points as Most Blatant Cheat at the 1986 ceremony, but his brief coaching career has already eclipsed that minor notoriety utterly.  It just goes to show, doesn’t it?  Never give up, because you don’t know what’s round the corner.

Small but imperfectly formed President Nicolas Sarkozy of France should have learned that lesson, and if he had he wouldn’t have mounted his arse-saving presidential enquiry into the performance of the French team.  But when did politicians ever learn anything?  Contrary to French histrionics and self-destructive scapegoating, their boys did them proud and are a national treasure, worthy of immortalisation.  Rejoice, France, rejoice!  “Le jour de gloire est arrivé!”, as it says in your splendidly jaunty anthem.  Second place in the table far eclipses your country’s 2006 performance when you finished second only in the narrow, almost meaningless Fifa competition and, despite points accrued from Zinedine Zidane’s outstanding nipplebutt on Materazzi, struggled to a far less impressive 5th place in the far more significant Sepp table.

France’s 2010 achievement is very different from Argentina’s, showing the different paths that can be pursued to greatness.  The gauchos excelled at the traditional virtues of attractive football, tragic hair, and man-on-man osculation, and – as noted – played an all-round game, while the baguette-munchers chose to dazzle us with an entirely different set of skills: flouncing, sulking, insulting each other’s mothers, infighting and egomania.  They are a specialist nation and amassed their massive points tally by displaying outstanding skill in their specialist fields.  By contrast with Argentina, they won three Sepps outright (Worst Team, Least Endearing Coach, and Closest Conformity to National Stereotype) and second place overall is very impressive given their highly specialised approach.  It has to be admired.  There are not many players in world football prepared to lose a match if the price of winning it is passing the ball to a team mate you hate, and other countries, oppressed by cowardly inhibition and team spirit, could learn a thing or two from France.  The 2010 World Cup would have been a poor spectacle without the French.  Long may they continue to dazzle us with mercurial brilliance.

Spain were another story, and it is gratifying that France’s much more interesting performance knocked the tapas-guzzlers back into the bronze medal position.  In 2006, mfk said this of Spain’s performance (22nd equal with Costa Rica):

Spain were the biggest disappointment of the Finals, merely scoring a second place in the Best Team category, two appearances in the Best Match category, and two nominations for Tragic Hair.  This was a sadly conventional and football-oriented performance by the Spanish, and I think we will all expect better of them in four years time.

Judge for yourself, reader, whether Spain did indeed improve on that performance in 2010, or whether they just got lucky and Spanish lack of imagination actually became more extreme.  Just see what happens to their placing next time when they don’t win the Fifa thing.  They have nothing to fall back on, no strength in depth, and have all their huevos in a single canasta.  Sad, narrow and limited.  Mfk suggests that their best bet for developing into a serious football power will be to build on their natural strengths of haughtiness and obscene hand gestures, but will they listen?  The future for Spanish football cannot be considered bright.

Italy, on the other hand, will rise again.  Risorgimento!  Just look at how high they finished given the brevity of their appearance before us, a shooting star that was there for only a moment but was oh so dazzlingly bright.  Like the French, they showed what football is really about.

England fell a long way from their 2006 position as world champions, and are perhaps unfortunate that the Panel – in an uncharacteristic obeisance to political correctness – grudgingly removed the popular categories of Ugliest Player, Ugliest Team and Most Replayed Bodily Function, on which England’s 2006 success was founded.  They did, however, demonstrate – in a manner that Spain for one could learn from – the power of dismal performance on the field, and have this entirely to thank for their comparatively high 5th equal placing (with Brazil and Uruguay) this time round.  Two Sepps (Most Sustained Abuse of his Defence by a Goalkeeper, and joint holders with Algeria of the 2010 award for Worst Match) are not a bad achievement to be going home with, and it may be noted that the English FA – unlike the short-sighted Brazilians – have seen the wisdom of not sacking their coach.  With that kind of team performance as a foundation, England can look forward to 2014 with optimism.

All in all – breathtaking Argentina aside – France, Italy and England show what the World Cup finals really stand for.  Just look at where ridiculous Fifa ranked them and you will understand why it is necessary for the Sepps to exist.  Credit needs to be given where it is due.  I mean, who really thinks the Netherlands were more interesting and enjoyable than France?  Get a grip.

Had he but world enough and time, mfk would gladly analyse the performance of every national team in the table – but time is a finite thing, at least today, and you can study the results for yourself.  The data will remain on the site in perpetuity, and it will take scholars many visits to comb them completely for their implications and significance.  For now, having covered the top teams, here are just a few random remarks on some of the talking points that stand out at first glance.

Mexico owe much to their referees.  Two of them scored Sepp points, and no other nation can match that.  The stand-out performance was by one of the stars of 2006, Marco “Draculito” Rodriguez proving it is possible to rise again successfully despite the many thousand tons of crucifixes to be found in his homeland, not to mention the number of people called Jesus.  Of Mexico’s total 14 points for tragic hair, 11 were scored by its referees, 10 of those by Draculito.  Mexico would do well to cherish his glossy widow’s peak and wrap him in a cotton wool coffin for resurrection in 2014.  A few drops of virgin’s blood, should that be available in Mexico, and he’ll be good as new.

Slovakia proved to us all that not only would it be unwise to visit a Slovakian barber, it would be rank insanity to enter a Slovakian tattoo parlour.  But they made up in enthusiasm what they may have lacked in artistry, scoring a total 14 points for hideously disfiguring tattoos alone.  You have to admire effort when you see it, and they were justly the runaway winners of the Sepp for Most Tattooed Team.

Portugal may be the unluckiest team.  14th place is not much to show for their talent at hurling themselves to the ground, the largest number of nominations (8) overall for Tragic Hair, and Raul Meireles’ outstandingly ill-judged tattoos.  They will have to develop some substance to go with the style and broaden their game.  Something is missing, and the Portuguese FA will need to work out what.  Perhaps they should take a lesson from Argentina and concentrate on their next coaching appointment.  Just imagine how their scores would rocket if Jose Mourinho finally stooped to coach his national team!

Brazil, both the Koreas, and USA – to their eternal shame – failed to gather a single nomination for Tragic Hair.  They will never become world champions with that approach.  To be fair, Brazil did come top in Silliest Use of a Razor and second in Most Copious Application of Hair Cream by a Referee, so they are on the right lines and will probably get better – but the other three are a disgrace to football.  USA dropped from 4th in 2006 to 19th, and will need to buck their ideas up if they are ever to be considered a footballing nation (no doubt Obama will blame the vuvuzelas for preventing USA from repeating their 2006 victory in the Best Song category – for “One superpower, there’s only one superpower” to the tune of Guantanamera or the girl from Guantanamo).  But the Korean peninsula probably has the most progress to make of any spot in the world.  Handicapped as they are by well-behaved, tidy supporters, they really do need to get past sensible hair, unblemished skin and staying on their feet when tackled if they are ever to be taken seriously.  South Korea’s pathetic 7 points came entirely from funny names and a single noteworthy effort as third worst team.  North Korea’s 14 points were double those of their southern rival and, while hardly impressive in the big picture, they must be considered the victors in the Battle of the Koreas.  Let’s hope that settles it and there will be no further need for miniature submarines.

What else?  Uruguay and Cote d’Ivoire (best in Africa hairwise, just pipping an admirably ludicrously coiffed South Africa) were highly commended by the Panel for the sheer number of their players who managed to make themselves look like total dickheads.  That’s the spirit.  Paraguay were the unluckiest all-rounders with a comparatively low final placing, but none the less made it creditably into the top 10.  Australia just won the Battle of Oceania (where?) with 13 points to New Zealand’s 11, but 10 of their points came for whining.  New Zealand’s performance was broader – picking up points for tragic hair, a surprisingly homoerotic goal celebration for a nation so fixated on sheep, participation in the third worst match, and an impressive runner-up spot as second worst team.   This was not bad for a newcomer and Australia must certainly work hard and beware complacency or the sheepbotherers will eclipse them.  A few more tattoo parlours in Sydney, preferably run by Slovakians, would be a good start.

And that’s enough commentary.  The table is below.  The World Cup finals 2010 are over.  See you in Brazil in 2014.

This is the final post in myfriendkeith’s World Cup Diary 2010 and he will now enjoy a well-earned vacation (he can’t afford the flight to Argentina so has chosen to reward runner-up France with his presence).  If you liked the Diary, know that the site – now it exists – will continue after a fashion.  It will be intermittent.  It will be erratic.  It will be controversial.  It will be wise.  Come back every now and then for some more whenever mfk can be arsed.

2010 World Cup Finals

FINAL TABLE

1.    ARGENTINA                                                   68
___________________________________
2.    FRANCE                                                                 55
3.    SPAIN                                                                     54
___________________________________
4.    ITALY                                                                     47
5=   BRAZIL                                                                 46
5=   ENGLAND                                                            46
5=   URUGUAY                                                            46
8.    GERMANY                                                            45
9.    PARAGUAY                                                           44
___________________________________
10.  GHANA                                                                   39
11.   COTE D’IVOIRE                                                   38
12.   SOUTH AFRICA                                                   36
13.   SLOVAKIA                                                             34
14.   PORTUGAL                                                           33
15.   NETHERLANDS                                                  32
___________________________________
16.   MEXICO                                                                28
17.   ALGERIA                                                               24
___________________________________
18.   NIGERIA                                                               19
19.   USA                                                                         18
20.   CAMEROON                                                         17
21.   GREECE                                                                 16
22= CHILE                                                                     14
22= NORTH KOREA                                                   14
24= AUSTRALIA                                                          13
24= JAPAN                                                                    13
26.  NEW ZEALAND                                                    11
___________________________________
27.   DENMARK                                                             8
28.   SOUTH KOREA                                                    7
29.   SERBIA                                                                   5
30= HONDURAS                                                           3
30= SLOVENIA                                                              3
30= SWITZERLAND                                                     3

You can see how each nation’s points were accrued by checking out the full listing of 2010 Sepp awards and nominations.  Click on The Sepps on the geekbar at the top.

Posted in The Sepps, World Cup | Leave a comment

The Sepp Awards: World Cup 2010

Despite the hasty appearance of at least two pale imitations of the Sepps since the World Cup final, the Panel has refused to be rushed into its decision making.  With full confidence in the Sepps as the premier awards in world football, resting on the rock solid base of a four year tradition, the Panel has taken its time to weigh all nominations, rank them according to their merits, and declare a truly worthy winner in each category.

The impatient should note that there were literally hundreds of nominations to consider in a total of 38 categories.  For the blue riband award (think Best Film, Best Actor or Best Actress at the Oscars, or the 800m and 1500m at the Olympic Games) of Most Tragic Hair there were over 70 nominations to sort through.  Rejoice – for this demonstrates unquestionably the vigorous health of world football and footballers’ continuing, nay growing ability to behave like immense twats.  There can be no doubt of the value of tuning in again in 4 years time for Brazil 2014 where we may confidently expect further records to tumble in even more exciting displays of footballing phallocephalism.

Also hotly contested was the coveted Hurling Themselves to the Ground Award, with some outstanding performances in terms of penalties and free kicks unfairly won.  There were a gratifying 27 nominations in all, with a further 10 candidates for the recently established Rivaldo Award (for clutching face or head when struck nowhere near it).    Some of the performances here gave hot competition to the Hurling Themselves to the Ground nominees, and some pundits have argued that the Rivaldo represents the next step in footballing evolution, claiming it is a superior class, making greater thespian demands on the player, and that the truly exceptional performances of 2010 were to be found here rather than in the traditional but perhaps stale category of Hurling Themselves to the Ground.  This is contentious stuff, though certainly the Panel was faced with a judgement of Paris when it came to the Rivaldo, having to choose between three nominees who had all scored a perfect ten in getting a blameless opponent shown the red card.  Achievements of this calibre indicate footballing skill of the highest order, rightly celebrated by the Sepps, and Rivaldo nominees provide aspirational role models for young players everywhere.  Mfk’s tip to purists and aesthetes:  the runaway popularity of the new category suggests this is one to watch for 2014.

Also new but outstandingly successful are the Lydia the Tattooed Lady Award (for most hideously disfiguring tattoos) and the Sepp for Most Tattooed Team.  This balances somewhat disappointing fields in two traditional categories, Most Homoerotic Goal Celebration and Best Porn Star Name.

Innovation is the life blood of the Sepps, and they remain the only football awards that accurately reflect why we watch and what we actually see before us on our screens.  For ease of reference, all 38 (numbered) categories are listed below – followed by the full listing of nominations and winners.

These awards are final, subject to:
(i)    appeals
(ii)    further research the Panel has commissioned into a number of shirt names that have been nominated for Most Pretentious Shirt Name.  The Sepp awarded in that category should meanwhile be regarded as provisional: the Panel has retained the statuette until a final verdict has been reached.

Appeals against awards, rankings and nominations may be lodged during the next 7 days, via the Comments function on this site.  All appeal rulings are published, together with the reasoning behind final decisions.

The glittering award ceremony in Sun City will take place after final confirmation of awards and – perhaps most excitingly – a rigorous mathematical process will then determine which nation won the World Cup finals 2010 and is thus best at football and most deserves our adulation and applause.  All 32 teams will be ranked in a final table – you will be able to see exactly how your country fared – and connoisseurs will be pleased to note there will be an analysis of national performances and a considered commentary by mfk.

Forget other golden trophies and baubles, and the laughable Capello Index.  Only the Sepps consider every aspect of footballing performance and tell you not just (yawn) who won, but who was actually best.

The Index of Sepp Categories may be found below, followed by the full provisional award listings.

Index of Sepp Categories 2010

1.  Most Tragic Hair
2.  Team Award for Girliest Hair
3.  Most Suspiciously Black Hair on a Man over 45
4.  Most Absurd Facial Hair
5.  Largest Amount of Stubble
(square meterage)

6.  Silliest Use of a Razor
7.  Most Copious Application of Hair Cream by a Referee
8.  Lydia the Tattooed Lady Award
for Most Hideously Disfiguring Tattoos

9.  Most Tattooed Team
10.  Best Name
11.  Best Porn Star Name
12.  Most Embarrassing Name
13.  Most Pretentious Shirt Name
14.  Sammy Lee Award
for Smallest Differential Between Length and Breadth and/or Shortest Distance from Arse to Ground

15.  Hurling Themselves to the Ground Award
16.  Rivaldo Award
for Clutching Face or Head When Struck Nowhere Near It

17.  Best Transition from Joy to Fury by a Coach
18.  Jose Mourinho Award
for Self-Regarding Sartorial Presentation by a Coach

19.  Most Endearing Coach
20.  Least Endearing Coach
21.  Most Homoerotic Goal Celebration
22.  Most Choreographed Goal Celebration
23.  Most Choreographed Anthem Behaviour
24.  Best Anthem
25.  Closest Conformity to National Stereotype
26.  Most Sustained Abuse of his Defence by a Goalkeeper
27.  Best Match
28.  Worst Match
29.  Best Team
30.  Worst Team
31. Best Team to Watch
32.  Best at Winning
33.  Best at Whining
34.  Worst Loser
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
35.  Worst Double Entendre by a Commentator
36.  Worst Metaphor by a Commentator
37.  Worst Pun by a Commentator
38.  Worst Cliché from a Sofa


THE 2010 SEPP AWARDS – FINAL RESULTS  (Provisional)

1.  Most Tragic Hair

1.    Benoit Assou-Ekotto (Cameroon) for the sea anemone
2.    Gervinho (Cote d’Ivoire) for his Klingon
3.    Marek Hamsik (Slovakia) for his Mohican electrocution victim
4.    Rigobert Song (Cameroon) for his Richard Coeur de Lion
5.    Siphiewe Tshabalala (South Africa) for his Lara Croft
6.    Martin Demichelis (Argentina) for the raised sides with bonus pony tail and clasp, for his primitive woman (vs Germany) and for changing it back at half time
7.    Sebastian Abreu (Uruguay) for his Pocahontas
8.    Didier Drogba (Cote d’Ivoire) for the girly pony tailette with hair slide and fringe at the back
9.    Walter Martinez (Honduras) for the yellow Alice band with green, yellow and red braided mullet
10.    Baccary Sagna (France) for the gilded braids with centre parting
11.    Diego Forlan (Uruguay) for the flowing locks with highlights and strip of knicker elastic
12.    Faouzi Chaouchi (Algeria) for his surprisingly blond William the Conqueror
13.    Liedson (Portugal) for the pubic transplant
14.    Giovani dos Santos (Mexico) for his little girl skipping to school
15.    Haedo Valdez (Paraguay) for his Westchester County housewife dressing down
16.    John Terry (England) for the Mohican-style toilet brush
17.    Brett Holman (Australia) for his Cheltenham Ladies College hockey captain
18.    Ludovic Magnin (Switzerland) for his netball captain
19.    Federico Marchetti (Italy) for his Benenden prefect
20.    Moeneeb Josephs (South Africa) for the safety match
21.    Danny (Portugal) for his Bo Derek
22.    Yoshito Okubo (Japan) for the striking auburnness with black knicker elastic
23.    Marko Pantelic (Serbia) for his bag lady
24.    Jonas Guttierez (Argentina) for his Frank Worthington with bonus pony tail
25.    Sergio Ramos (Spain) for his blond Apache with black knicker elastic
26.    Sergio Ramos (Spain) for his blond Apache with beaded headband
27.    Marcus Tulio Tanaka (Japan) for his samurai
28.    Diego Lugano (Uruguay) for a bun
29.    Josh Kennedy (Australia) for his Jesus
30.    Giorgios Samaras (Greece) for his Conan the Barbarian
31.    Carlos Tevez (Argentina) for the Alice band
32.    Ivan Vicelich (New Zealand) for the unnecessary, dangling piece of string
33.    Pedro Mendes (Portugal) for the extended mullet with piece of string
34.    Milivoje Novakovic (Slovenia) for his Charles Hawtry with unnecessary piece of string
35.    Diego Lugano (Uruguay) for the permed curls on his forehead
36.    Robin van Persie (Holland) for his Tintin
37.    Martin Jorgenson (Denmark) for the lawn mower accident
38.    Doni Novak (Slovenia) for his Stacy out of Gavin and Stacy
39.    Aureliano Torres (Paraguay) for his Adolf Hitler in the 1960s
40.    Fabio Coentrao (Portugal) for his Rod Stewart with roots
41.    Enrique Vera (Paraguay) for his Michael Heseltine with highlights
42.    Yuji Nakazawa (Japan) for his George Harrison
43.    Danny (Portugal) for his Ena Sharples
44.    Sami Khedini (Germany) for his dinner lady
45.    Hakan Yakin (Switzerland) (also) for his dinner lady
46.    Karim Ziani (Algeria) for the orange toupee
47.    Milos Krasic (Serbia) for his Boris Johnson
48.    Reneilwe Letsholonyane (South Africa) for his Whoopi Goldberg
49.    David James (England) for the crop circles with bonus braided mullet
50.    Christian Poulsen (Denmark) for the beaded headband in national colours
51.    Carles Puyol (Spain) and Andres Guardado (Mexico) for perms
52.    David James (England), Glen Johnson (England), Florent Malouda (France), Walter Martinez (Honduras), Chidi Odiah (Nigeria), Alvaro Pereira (Uruguay), Steven Pienaar (South Africa), Alvaro Pereira (Uruguay) and Prince Tagoe (Ghana) for braided mullets
53.    Hassan Yebda (Algeria) for a surprisingly blond flat top Mohican
54.    Kagisho Dikgacoi (South Africa), Abdelkader Ghezzal (Algeria), Salomon Kalou (Cote d’Ivoire), Teko Modise (South Africa) and Siaka Tiene (Cote d’Ivoire) for flat top Mohicans
55.    Sani Kaita (Nigeria) for the gym mat near the front
56.    Duda (Portugal) for his Creature from the Black Lagoon
57.    Angel di Maria (Argentina) for the flattened cockatoo
58.    Lucas Barrios (Paraguay), Vincenzo Iaquinto (Italy), Miroslav Klose (Germany) and Arturo Vidal (Chile) for crested cockatoos
59.    Bruno Alves (Portugal) for his Elvis
60.    Giovani dos Santos (Mexico) for his Ronaldinho
61.    Simon Kjaer (Denmark) for his Bjorn Borg
62.    Daniel Agger (Denmark), Nicklas Bendtner (Denmark), Cristiano Ronaldo (Portugal) and David Villa (Spain) for scrubbing brushes
63.    Keisuke Honda (Japan) for orangeness
64.    Isaac Vorsah (Ghana) for the toilet brush
65.    Dickson Etuhu (Nigeria) for the mop
66.    Paraguay (team effort) for industrial quantities of hair cream
67.    Ricardo Montolivo (Italy) for black knicker elastic
68.    Mauro Camoranesi (Italy), Martin Demichelis (Argentina), Jonas Guttierez (Argentina), Reneilwe Letsholonyane (South Africa), and Sergio Romero (Argentina) for pony tails

2.  Team Award for Girliest Hair

1.    Argentina
2.    Uruguay
3.    Paraguay

3.  Most Suspiciously Black Hair on a Man over 45

1.    Gerardo Martino (Paraguay)
2.    Diego Maradona (Argentina)
3.    Fabio Capello (England)
4.    Otto Rehhagel (Greece)
5.    Joachim Low (Germany)

4.  Most Absurd Facial Hair

1.    David Villa (Spain) for the world’s smallest beard
2.    Enrique Vera (Paraguay) for the underchin merkin
3.    Egidio Arevalo (Uruguay) for the landing strip
4.    Luis Fabiano (Brazil) and Nigel de Jong (Holland) for the bit missed when shaving
5.    Oguchi Onyewu (USA) for his Afrikaaner fundamentalist
6.    Djibril Cisse (France) for the perpetually startling blondness
7.    Diego Maradona (Argentina) for his Bond villain
8.    Mauricio Victorino (Uruguay) for his Mel Ferrer as Toulouse Lautrec
9.    Prince Tagoe (Ghana) for the chinstrap
10.    Karim Ziani (Algeria) for his Errol Flynn
11.    Didier Zokora (Cote d’Ivoire) for his Viva Zapata
12.    Dejan Stankovic (Serbia) for the bum fluff

5.  Largest Amount of Stubble (square meterage)

1.    Greece
2.    Argentina
3.    Italy
4.    Germany
5.    Portugal

6.  Silliest Use of a Razor

1.    Ramires (Brazil) for the cord for hanging his glasses on
2.    Boubacar Barry (Cote d’Ivoire) for the Erich von Danekem alien ley lines on top of his head
3.    Aaron Lennon (England), for eyebrows and temples

7.  Most Copious Application of Hair Cream by a Referee

1.    Marco “Draculito” Rodriguez (Mexico)
2.    Carlos Simon (Brazil)
3.    Olegario Benquerenca (Portugal)
4.    Oscar Ruiz (Colombia)
5.    Benito Archundia (Mexico)

8.  Lydia the Tattooed Lady Award for Most Hideously Disfiguring Tattoos

1.    Kevin-Prince Boateng (Ghana) for the large pair of dice and the princely coronet on his neck, and also for his arms of many tongues
2.    Raul Meireles (Portugal) for two Illustrated Man arms, with woman in bra, and sell-by date on the back of his neck
3.    Djibril Cisse (France) for his leopardskin and Spiderman arms with fully tattooed neck
4.    Martin Skrtl (Slovakia) for two dirty-effect arms and Veni, vidi, vici on his ribs and for taking his shirt off to display it
5.    Rais M’Bolhi (Algeria) for the dirty neck effect and the star behind the ear
6.    Daniel Agger (Denmark) and Peter Pekarik (Slovakia) for two Illustrated Man arms (each)
7.    Gregory van der Wiel (Holland) for an Illustrated Man right arm plus dirty neck effect
8.    Simone Pepe (Italy) for the busy right arm and the left arm butterflies
9.    Marek Hamsik (Slovakia) for the prison tattoo on his neck and the wannabe sexy garter and for rolling his sock down so that we could see it
10.    Simon Kjaer (Denmark) for one dirty-effect forearm and stars on the other
11.    Miroslav Stoch (Slovakia) for the mountain ranges on his forearm
12.    Fernando Torres (Spain) for his forearms of many tongues
13.    Jay DeMerit (USA) for his Illustrated Man arm
14.    Zdeno Strba (Slovakia) for his Gothic lettered forearms
15.    Tim Cahill (Australia) for a sub-Maori arm

9.  Most Tattooed Team

1.    Slovakia
2.    No other nominations were even considered

10.  Best Name

1.   Siphiewe Tshabalala (South Africa)
2.    Gaetan Bong (Cameroon)
3.    Sokratis Papastathopoulos (Greece)
4.    Oh Beom Seok (South Korea)
5.    Cuauhtemoc Blanco (Mexico)
6.    Waldo Ponce (Chile)
7.    Mun In Guk (North Korea)
8.    Faouzi Chaouchi (Algeria)
9.    Bongani Khumalo (South Africa)
10.    Marcus Tulio Tanaka (Japan)
11.    Mario Eggimann (Switzerland)
12.    Zdeno Strba (Slovakia)
13.    Uwa Elderson Echiejile (Nigeria)
14.    Edson Buddle (USA)

11.  Best Porn Star Name

1.    Kim Kum Il (North Korea)
2.    Hans-Jorg Butt (Germany)
3.    Lee Dong Gook (South Korea)
4.    Kim Dong Jin (South Korea)
5.    Dickson Etuhu (Nigeria)
6.    Peter Pekarik (Slovakia)
7.    Pantelis Kapitanos (Greece)
8.    Marko Pantelic (Serbia)
9.    Kagisho Dikgacoi (South Africa)

12.  Most Embarrassing Name

1.    Danny Shittu (Nigeria)
2.    Lionel Messi (Argentina)
3.    Nwankwo Kanu (Nigeria)
4.    Rafael van der Vaart (Holland)
5.    John Pantsil (Ghana)

13.  Most Pretentious Shirt Name

1.    Kevin-Prince Boateng (Ghana) for Prince
2.    Claudio Barretto (Germany) for Cacau (title of a Brazilian modernist novel)

14.  Sammy Lee Award for Smallest Differential Between Length and Breadth and/or Shortest Distance from Arse to Ground

1.    Nestor Ortigoza (Paraguay)
2.    Diego Maradona (Argentina)
3.    Jermaine Defoe (England)

15.  Hurling Themselves to the Ground Award

1.    Italy
2.    Jorge Fucile (Uruguay) penalty awarded against South Africa
3.    David Villa (Spain) penalty awarded against Paraguay
4.    Mesut Ozil (Germany) yellow card for simulation
5.    Glen Johnson (England) yellow card for simulation
6.    Tiago (Portugal) yellow card for simulation
7.    Sergio Ramos (Spain) yellow card against Giovanni van Bronckhorst of Holland
8.    Andres Iniesta (Spain) yellow card against Gregory van der Wiel of Holland
9.    Diego Perez (Uruguay) yellow card against Cho Yong Hyung of South Korea
10.    Kaka (Brazil) free kick awarded against North Korea
11.    Frank Lampard (England) free kick awarded against Germany
12.    Jan Mucha (Slovakia) told to get up by referee Howard Webb
13.    Cristiano Ronaldo (Portugal)
14.    Arjen Robben (Holland)
15.    Mark van Bommel (Holland)
16.    Lionel Messi (Argentina)
17.    Maicon (Brazil)
18.    Argentina
19.    Franck Ribery (France)
20.    Bastian Schweinsteiger (Germany)
21.    Uruguay
22.    Siphiewe Tshabalala (South Africa)
23.    Luis Suarez (Uruguay)
24.    Thomas Muller (Germany)
25.    Carles Puyol (Spain)
26.    Robin van Persie (Holland)
27.    Lucio (Brazil)

16.  Rivaldo Award for Clutching Face or Head When Struck Nowhere Near It

1.    Abdul Kader Keita (Cote d’Ivoire)  Kaka of Brazil sent off
2.    Jean Beausejour (Chile) and Arturo Vidal (Chile)  Behrami of Switzerland sent off
3.    Joan Capdevila (Spain) Ricardo Costa of Portugal sent off
4.    Jan Macha (Slovakia) yellow card
5.    Fabio Quagliarella (Italy) yellow card
6.    Didier Zokora (Cote d’Ivoire)
7.    Domenico Criscito (Italy)
8.    Luis Suarez (Uruguay)
9.    Miroslav Stoch (Slovakia)
10.    Robin van Persie (Holland)

17.  Best Transition from Joy to Fury by a Coach

1.    Javier “Wrath of God” Aguirre (Mexico) for the Vela goal disallowed against South Africa
2.    Fabio Capello (England) for the Lampard goal disallowed against Germany

18.  Jose Mourinho Award for Self-Regarding Sartorial Presentation by a Coach

1.    Joachim Low (Germany)
2.    Dunga (Brazil)

19.  Most Endearing Coach

1.    Carlos Alberto Parreira (South Africa)
2.    Diego Maradona (Argentina)

20.  Least Endearing Coach

1.    Raymond Domenech (France)
2.    Oscar Tabarez (Uruguay)

21.  Most Homoerotic Goal Celebration

1.    Didier Drogba (Cote d’Ivoire) for the neck snog on Yaya Toure
2.    Carlos Tevez (Argentina) for the ear snog on Diego Maradona
3.    Argentina (vs Nigeria and Mexico)
4.    Spain (vs Paraguay and Portugal)
5.    Uruguay (vs South Africa and Ghana)
6.    Italy (vs Paraguay)
7.    Paraguay (vs Italy)
8.    Portugal (vs North Korea)
9.    Slovakia (vs Italy)
10.    New Zealand (vs Italy)
11.    England (vs USA)
12.    Paraguay (vs South Africa)
13.    Denmark (vs Cameroon)

22.  Most Choreographed Goal Celebration

1.    Ghana (vs Australia)
2.    South Africa (vs Mexico)

23.  Most Choreographed Anthem Behaviour

1.    USA for the Springtime for Hitler chorus line
2.    France for the chain cuddle behind their backs
3.    Italy for the arms across the shoulders and operatic singing to an interminable tune
4.    South Korea for the unison nipple clutching with military salute
5.    Chile for the nipple clutching conga
6.    Mexico for the coronary salutes
7.    Portugal for the arms across the shoulders with matching coaching team and substitutes while shouting the anthem (except for Cristiano Ronaldo who can’t learn the words)
8.    Japan for the arms across the shoulders with pair of goalkeeping gloves
9.    Brazil, Ghana and Honduras for nipple clutching
10.    Everyone else for arms across the shoulders

24.  Best Anthem

1.    Uruguay
2.    France

25.  Closest Conformity to National Stereotype

1.    France
2.    Argentina
3.    Italy
4.    England

26.  Most Sustained Abuse of his Defence by a Goalkeeper

1.    David James (England)
2.    Federico Marchetti (Italy)
3.    Tim Howard (USA)
4.    Richard Kingson (Ghana)

27.  Best Match

1.    Slovakia vs Italy
2.    Spain vs Portugal
3.    Uruguay vs Germany
4.    Argentina vs Mexico
5.    Ghana vs Germany
6.    Cote d’Ivoire vs Brazil
7.    Nigeria vs South Korea
8.    Slovenia vs USA
9.    Chile vs Spain

28.  Worst Match

1.    England vs Algeria
2.    Paraguay vs Japan
3.    Italy vs New Zealand
4.    Brazil vs Portugal
5.    Spain vs Paraguay

29.  Best Team

1.    Spain
2.    Germany
3.    Brazil
4.    Mexico
5.    Holland
6.    Uruguay
7.    Ghana
8.    Paraguay
9.    USA
10.    Chile
11.    Serbia
12.    Argentina

30.  Worst Team

1.   France
2.    New Zealand
3.    North Korea
4.    England
5.    Italy
6.    Algeria

31. Best Team to Watch

1.    Spain
2.    Germany
3.    Argentina
4.    Brazil
5.    Ghana
6.    Japan

32.  Best at Winning

1.    Holland
2.    Brazil
3.    Chile
4.    Argentina
5.    Spain

33.  Best at Whining

1.    Australia
2.    France
3.    Holland
4.    Frank Lampard (England)
5.    Fabio Capello (England)

34.  Worst Loser

1.    Holland
2.    Lula da Silva (Brazil)
3.    Diego Maradona (Argentina)

35.  Worst Double Entendre by a Commentator

1.    Gary Lineker (BBC – France vs Mexico) for “I’m pleased to see the Mexicans relieving themselves so well”
2.    ITV (USA vs England) for “A half-time roasting from Fabio Capello has become routine of late”
3.    Mark Lawrenson (BBC – Germany vs Serbia) for “He had a day to forget, the young German left back Badstuber, because Krasic actually roasted him all day long”
4.    Adrian Chiles (ITV – USA vs England) for “And there you have it – the usual mixture of hump and horror”

36.  Worst Metaphor by a Commentator

1.    Steve Wilson, BBC for “Look at Tevez, like a one-man battleship trying to wrestle his way through the German defence”

37.  Worst Pun by a Commentator

1.    Sadly unidentified, ITV for “… as Sven-Goran Eriksson tinkers with the Ivories once more”
2.    Gary Lineker, BBC (at the end of Germany 4 Argentina 0) for “Eins, zwei, drei – they have struck vier into every other World Cup rival”
3.    Guy Mowbray, BBC for “It’s the Netherlands against Spain – it’s orange against clockwork”
4.    Martin Keown, BBC for “He’s played like a Rolls Royce tonight, Honda”
5.    Mark Lawrenson, BBC (in response to Steve Wilson’s “He made Neuer hurry though”) for “Yes – paraNeuer”
6.    Jim Beglin, ITV for “Mensah should be cleverer than that”
7.    Mark Lawrenson, BBC (in response to Steve Wilson’s “He ignored David Silva’s run”) for “Hey ho”

38.  Worst Cliché from a Sofa

1.    Gary Lineker (BBC) for “It just goes to show – in football you never know”
2.    Gareth Southgate (England) for “You can only feel for the kid”

Posted in The Sepps, World Cup | 1 Comment

The reign of Spain is inhumanely plain

Well mfk liked it … though every puce-faced, moral-high-horse headline today cries shame, brutality, mayhem, worst final ever, and the end of global civilisation as we know it.  Headlines in the Netherlands will be somewhat different.

The Dutch are blaming the ref.  Everyone else is blaming the Dutch.

But (and look back if you didn’t read it yesterday) what did mfk predict?  Spain seeking to be their normal, tippy-tappy, ball-hogging selves, with hulking northern Europeans (yes, Mark van Bommel was named) getting stuck in to them.  And that, if you’ll pardon mfk for telling you so, is what we got.  Result!

There was blood; there was snot; there was booing; there was more rolling, tumbling, hurling of oneself to the ground and screams of agony than when mfk, aged 8, competed with his friends to see who could perform the best death in the game of cowboys and Indians, cops and robbers, merry men versus the Sheriff of Nottingham’s heavies (whose only thespian function, as far as we could tell, was falling off horses when leapt on from above by a merry man), or whatever excuse for dying with limbs flailing and face contorted we happened to be playing that day.

Mfk had decided, in case you missed him yesterday, to support Holland – mainly as the underdog but also for the hell of it.  The alternative was to line himself up with all those kingfishers* droning on about Spain’s easy-on-the-eye football and the importance of artistry and beauty triumphing over a tightly organised defence and two screening midfielders with murder on their minds.

*  In the middle ages they believed that kingfishers turned to face whatever direction the wind was blowing.

Mfk, like any aesthete, is of course on the side of Barcelona, Arsenal, Spain, and beauty generally.  Beauty is truth; truth beauty.  But what kind of a crap world would it be if every team played tippy-tappy?  The ancient Romans didn’t match two gladiators against each other in the arena – and in case you are moved to disagree based on your deep historical knowledge gleaned from such eminent scholarly figures as Russell Crowe or any other Australian pretending unconvincingly to be a gladiator (how the hell did the Aussies get a stranglehold on the camp gladiator thing?  I mean, think about it.  And is anyone else enjoying the self-parodying, utterly brilliantly gloriously ludicrous Spartacus: Blood and Sand?) – be advised that gladiator means bloke with a short sword.  Two blokes with short swords beating balletic hell out of each other is just dull – as we saw in that episode of Spartacus: Blood and Sand where Spartacus and Crixus, both gladiators (and therefore both Australians of course), fight in the arena.  The director was reduced to shots of their faces seen from inside their helmets – not only brilliantly innovative but deeply hilarious – because the actual fight was crap.  No, what the ancient Romans – who knew a thing or two about spectacles in arenas – used to do was to match a gladiator against a retiarius, the bloke with the lead-weighted net and the trident.  Now that was entertainment.  OK, later it got a bit silly with giraffes against bears, or 10 gladiators against an elephant, or Christians against lions – but the principle holds good.

This, ultimately, is why mfk decided not to be a kingfisher and to go for the Netherlands last night – and of course, having taken that completely arbitrary decision, everything changed.  Such is the miraculous alchemy of football.

Well, OK, not everything changed.  Mark van Bommel remained a horrible, obnoxious bastard for example – but mfk now viewed him in an entirely different light, as our horrible, obnoxious bastard.  “Go on Mark – get stuck in!” was the cry in the mfk household.  And he didn’t disappoint.

Because – let’s face it – it was the Netherlands’ only chance, wasn’t it?  Anyone with half an eye – which counts out football journalists and kingfishers everywhere – could see that this was exactly what Holland were going to do because it was the only choice they had.  They had to break up the Spanish patterns, stop them from flowing, and – if possible – reduce them a bit.  If done thoroughly and comprehensively, the Spaniards might even go to pieces and get themselves sent off for retaliating.

It started really well, with Robin van Persie kicking the back of Joan* Capdevilla’s leg after 14 minutes – though why the heck we had to wait 14 minutes mfk could not imagine.  It was an eternity.  Van Persie can be a nasty bastard when he wants to, and may have been the most versatile player on the pitch: silken centre forward for tippy-tappy Arsenal and simultaneously able to kick opponents’ legs viciously at the drop of a vuvuzela.  Not many in the tournament were that flexibly skilled, and personally mfk would have given the Golden Ball to van Persie rather than knicker-elastic Forlan who is a one-trick pony.

* Be honest – is there any other nation that would pick a player called Joan?  Even Argentina, much as they love a perm, would baulk at that.  The Spanish also had one called Jesus, albeit – did you notice? – with the eyes of Satan.  The best the Dutch could manage was a Wesley – which was really confusing, because Wesley and Jesus are supposed to play on the same team.   Wesley (Sneijder) has also recently converted to Catholicism.  Maybe he’ll change his name to Jesus now.  It would certainly make it easier to keep track.

The Dutch shared the yellow cards round, as obviously prearranged and practiced in training, much as other teams might decide the order in which they would take penalty kicks in the event of a shoot-out.  The system permitted maximum damage to the Spaniards while keeping every orange enforcer on the pitch.  “Go on”, you could see them signalling to each other, “it’s your turn to kick one of the bastards next.”

The fouls were thoughtfully administered too, with Andres Iniesta the main target for strategic reducers*.

*  In case you know nothing about football, be aware that a reducer is what is also known as getting your retaliation in first.  You choose the opposition’s most skilful player, a midfield playmaker like Iniesta or a tricksy winger who’s beating you for pace, and you get up his arse and kick him as hard as you can on the knee joint or the ankle, or else stamp on his foot.  This reduces his ability to cause you any problems and gives you a chance of winning the game when the other lot have made the basic error of being better than you.

It was working also, in that the Spaniards started to forget about tippy-tappy and retaliate.  Carles Puyol was the next yellow card, for a reducer on the obvious Dutch target, Robben.

But on 21 minutes it began to go horribly wrong.  Mark van Bommel crunched in on Iniesta, duly receiving his yellow card – but Iniesta was not stretchered off.  In case you did not or even still do not realise the significance of this, imagine that you are hunting a wounded African buffalo with one bullet left in your elephant gun.  You see the buffalo.  You get it in your sights.  You slowly and carefully squeeze the trigger.  Your bullet hits it – but it’s only a flesh wound!  Aarghhh!  The buffalo flares its nostrils, paws the ground, glares at you with a fixed, murderous intensity, and charges.  You’ve got no bullets left.  You’re buggered.  Splat.

This was the situation Holland were in after van Bommel kicked Iniesta to the ground but failed to cripple him.  Van B. had used up his only bullet, because if he did it again he’d be sent off, and he is Holland’s elephant gun.  Basically the Netherlands were buggered and the end, while it might be delayed for as long as you could go on dodging the buffalo, was inevitable.  Splat.  Or, to put it in football parlance, Iniesta scored.

Yes, yes, we got another 6 yellow cards for Holland, but these were pebbles from a slingshot, not armour-piercing shells from an elephant gun.  Nigel de Jong, did his best, bless him –  risking a red card in his heroic attempt to break Xabi Alonso’s ribcage – but it was all just going through the motions.

It so nearly worked though, didn’t it?  Time froze when Robben was put through with only Casillas to beat, and billions could see Robben’s every thought as though inscribed in subtitles on their TV screens.

This is the most significant moment in my entire life.  My whole future and the meaning of my existence hang in the balance.   I can score what will probably be the goal that brings Holland its first ever World Cup and be famous forever, even after I’m dead, or I can blow it.

What a metaphor for human existence that is, and who would wish to be in that position?  Who says footballers are overpaid?  Mfk would definitely have blown it – he said so at the time – and of course Robben did.  Such is life.

It happened to Cesc Fabregas later on, of course, but weep not for him.  A few minutes later he put through the slide rule pass that gave Iniesta his chance and led to the goal – not as good as scoring yourself, but still respectable and you get a winner’s medal for it even though he spent most of the tournament on the bench.  More than he might have hoped really.  Robben just got a loser’s medal, which may be worse than no medal at all.

Though if you’re looking for the moment of greatest tragedy, it was the next – and last – time Robben got through.  Puyol wrestled him, Graeco-Roman style, and Robben could have gone down – on any other occasion would have gone down – but he still thought he might score and the prize – ah, the prize – was immortality.  He could not resist its lure.  He stayed on his feet.  He didn’t score.  And no foul was given!  The irony.  The tragedy.  It’s for moments like this that we watch football in the first place.  Forget Sophocles and Shakespeare – rank amateurs.

Now let’s leave aside the deeply ironic fact that if you hurl yourself to the ground you get a penalty, while if you stay pluckily on your feet like Dick Lionheart or Pele you get nothing (unless you’re Pele, in which case you score anyway, but how many of us are Pele?) – and let’s spare a thought for the poor bloody ref.  Not giving Robben a penalty and not sending Puyol off was a game-turning moment, and was one of two errors the ref made (as far as mfk was able to notice), the second being not giving Holland a corner when the ball had clearly deflected off Fabregas – very shortly followed by Iniesta’s goal, so it was another game-turning moment.  You can see why the Dutch are blaming it all on the ref.

It’s not really fair – would you have liked to referee that game? – for the poor bugger did his utmost to keep the game flowing; and Holland can thank him for understanding the most important thing of all: that you don’t send someone off in a World Cup final if you can possibly help it.  Presumably that’s why Fifa chose him (or perhaps not, for it would imply rationality and goodwill on Fifa’s part), because he wasn’t one of those stupid martinets who shows people red cards for farting and makes himself the unwelcome star of the show.  Practically any other ref would have sent de Jong off, not just shown him a yellow card, and practically any other ref would have reduced the Netherlands to about 8 players by half time, turning the game into a farce.  So it’s a bit mean that the orange half of the stadium booed him at the end, given that any other ref would have prevented Holland’s game plan from working at all – but he did make those two mistakes; they were crucial; and more people than have ever watched anything before in the history of planet Earth saw it.

The real questions is: why the heck would anyone want to be a referee?  Because you can’t play like Arjen Robben must be the answer – but is it worth it?

Which takes mfk to a current German joke, if you do not regard that concept as against nature:

Q.  What do you call an Englishman in the World Cup final?
A.  The referee.

Of course it would work better if any Germans had appeared in the 2010 final – but you can’t have everything.  It’s still pretty funny.  And they do have the psychic octopus whom the English foolishly sold them – even if the Italians are claiming he wasn’t born in Weymouth after all but was caught in the Adriatic and is therefore called not Paul but Paolo.  This is actually an Italian joke – because the argument behind the claim is that this means that the action of an Italian decided the winner of the World Cup after all – and it is therefore also quite funny and should raise everyone’s opinion of the Italians.

If you want poignant, with a bit of irony chucked in, you need to look at the royals.  No one, unless colour blind or watching in black and white, could mistake the Prince of Orange, for his massive orange scarf was a clue (God bless the bicycling monarchies – can you imagine that stuffed shirt the Prince of Wales in an England scarf?) and the Dutch and Spanish royals sat side by side, pretending to be royally civilised about it all.  But did you notice them the moment Iniesta scored?  The Spanish royals were doing an unroyal flamenco while the Dutch ones looked like a scene from Hamlet – the moment when Hamlet gets cut by the poisoned and unbated rapier in the duel with Laertes.  Prince Willem-Alexander sat like Claudius at the back, sideways from the action, with his chin in his hand, while Princess Maxima had made her way to the very front of the royal loge and stood, Gertrude-like, with her hand over her mouth.

Let us not forget, when contemplating this tableau, that Spain once ruled the Netherlands and that it was Willem-Alexander’s ancestor, Willem of Orange, who threw off the hated Spanish yoke.  The revolt of the Spanish Netherlands led, in the early seventeenth century, to the collapse of Spain as a major European power.

Not this time.

History is always present when the great European powers meet on the football field and history, as we all know, has a way of eventually biting you in the bum.

So there we are.  Spain won – and it was a victory for beautiful football, so you can’t say it was a bad thing.  It was fun cheering for Holland – come on you boring moralisers, let’s hear it for assault and battery – but even the Dutch, having cursed the referee, admit that Spain were better.

Dutch coach Bert van Marwijk, with typical Dutch honesty, made no bones about his team’s approach:

“We did a good job tactically on them.  It’s not our style, but you play a match to win.

I would have loved to have won that match, even with not so beautiful football.”

And the penultimate irony?  Well – who was it who taught the Spanish to play like that?  Step forward Johann Cruyff, incarnated Dutch deity of ‘total football’ – invented by the Dutch, practised by the Dutch, taught to the Spanish by Cruyff and the Dutchmen who followed him at Barcelona, and now practised supremely by the Spanish to the point where the Dutch had to revert to playing ugly to stand a chance.

A fabulous result for Spain – top of the world, Ma – but oh how cruel for Holland.  There’s no doubt about it – the Spanish are best – but the greater the victory, the greater the defeat.  Poor Holland.  Will they ever reach another final?

And who will beat the Spanish now?  Their players are young, a golden generation.  Will they reign forever?

No, of course they won’t.  Germany will give them a game when their players are old enough to drive, and Brazil and Argentina are already stirring, like Arnie’s steel skeleton in The Terminator, and vowing “I’ll be back.”  And let’s not forget that anything can happen in a game of football.  Why, only a few months ago Spain were beaten by the USA.

You’ll be wondering – if you know what penultimate means – what the final irony is.  Well, who taught the Spanish to play football in the first place?  Yup, it was the English.  Bet they’re sorry now.

Although we now know who holds the trophy, come back later this week to find out who won.  The full, final 2010 Sepp awards will be published, together with the traditional league table showing who bored the arse of us and who entertained us most.  Never mind the goals and all that nonsense, let’s hear it for tragic hair, hideously disfiguring tattoos, bad losers, hurling oneself to the ground, clutching the face when struck nowhere near it, homoerotic goal celebrations, and embarrassing names.  The Panel will take a day or two to work it all out, but don’t be one of those losers who thinks Spain were best because they got to take the golden bauble back to Madrid.  To find out who were the real winners in South Africa, keep logging on to the voice of sanity, my friend Keith.

Posted in Holland, Referees, Spain, The Sepps, World Cup | Leave a comment

Who to support in the Final, how to be a bad loser, the virtues of hatred, will Americans ever get “soccer”, and Diego Forlan’s hair.

Don’t let anyone ever tell you there is such a thing as a ‘neutral’ in football.  A ‘neutral’ is someone who isn’t interested.  They’re the ones who ask, as Arjen Robben beats nine clogging defenders to open up a shooting chance, ‘didn’t he used to be married to Whitney Houston?’

If you’re not going to support one team or the other, there’s no point.  In previewing the semi-finals, mfk suggested that your reason for supporting one team rather than another should be as random and arbitrary as possible.  This is one of the great principles of football.  Manchester United could not be the success story it is if people living 12,000 miles from west Manchester, who can’t even pronounce Manchester, didn’t decorate their bedrooms with red devils merchandise.

Leaving Manchester United aside, as mfk is always happy to do*, the other great principle in football is to answer the question ‘whom do I hate more?’ and then support their opponents.  Arsenal supporters will cheer for ManU if they’re playing Tottenham.  This is the principle mfk recommends you adopt tonight.

*  Q.  Which 3 teams in the English league have rude words in their names?
A.  Arsenal, Scunthorpe, and Manchester f**king United.

The normal approach would be – and most newspapers mfk has seen are taking this line – to say that Spain play the more attractive football and are the less negative of the two finalists, so should prevail by right and in the interest of attractive football.  What a dreary approach that is.  To help you develop a proper reason for supporting one or the other, mfk will now provide you with some sound reasons for hatred.

A short hike from mfk’s house, on top of a Welsh hill, is a British ‘naval temple’, erected early in the nineteenth century by grateful merchants to celebrate the great British admirals whose naval victories made Britain an economic and military superpower and made the heyday of the British Empire possible.  There are various plaques and inscriptions honouring Nelson and the rest, but mfk’s favourite is the one wishing confusion to the Spanish and the Dutch.  It is always more fun to hate than to love – but which of these two former foes of the Welsh should we choose tonight to hate more?

Now at this point mfk must admit that he was going to support Spain because they are a purer footballing side and (never to be discounted as a reason) they may well win.  But he came to his senses as he started to notice just how smug the Spaniards are getting about this.  Spaniards too numerous to bother naming have been pontificating this week on the reasons why the Spanish national team – and La Liga – are superior to football in other countries.  Not only is this insufferable arrogance, they are all acting as if they’ve already won the Cup.  La Liga isn’t superior to other leagues, and they haven’t.

Brilliant technicians though they may be, caressing the ball as if it were a lover, consider anyone’s likelihood to nod off as Spanish players starve the opposition of the ball, retaining possession for 85 of the 90 minutes with tippy-tappy passes.  Don’t you just long for some hulking, thuggish northern European to go barging in to them, scattering them like ninepins, before belting the ball agriculturally past a preferably flattened and bloodied keeper?  Wouldn’t that be more entertaining?  Who will give you most to laugh at – Xavi or van Bommel?  Never thought I’d be commending van Bommel, but here are some reasons to hate Spain:

1.    They’re smug.
2.    They torture animals to death for entertainment – and claim it is beautiful.
3.    They eat garlic.  And octopuses.
4.    They invented flamenco dancing.
5.    They regard blacking up as humorous.
6.    They burned Jews and Muslims to death as acts of faith during the very charming Spanish Inquisition.
7.    They claim (with some justification) that Gibraltar should be part of Spain – while simultaneously claiming (with no justification, according to their own argument about Gibraltar) that the other pillar of Hercules, Ceuta, which is on the other side of the Mediterranean and in another continent entirely, belongs to Spain and not Morocco.  Hypocrites.
8.    This is their first final and they think they deserve to win it.  What about Holland, who’ve entertained us in two finals?  Don’t they have more of a right?  Arrogant.
9.    They lisp.  And they put o on the end of words.
10.    They have sold out their most beautiful coastline to brick red people who copulate and urinate in the streets while wearing, or not wearing, Union Jack underpants.
11.    They are on £500,000 each to win the Cup, negotiated with the Spanish FA prior to the tournament by Iker Casillas, Xavi and Carles Puyol.  Patriots?  Playing for the honour and glory of Spain?  Mercenary bastards more like.  Mercenary rich bastards.
12.    They have had a fascist dictatorship in modern times, while the Dutch have never had one.
13.    They invented the word machismo.
14.    They are cruel to donkeys.
15.    They go to sleep in the afternoon.
16.    They think women should be virgins but men shouldn’t.
17.    They insult your mother while holding their crotches.
18.    They sold Florida to the Americans, without telling them it was a swamp.
19.    They lie through their teeth about their honourable intentions while actually being sly and devious in tapping up the players of other clubs to come and play for their ‘superior’ clubs.
20.    La Liga is a duopoly – Barca and Real keep all the money and so La Liga is actually a very dull two-horse race between oligarchs, against all principles of fairness – or entertainment.
21.    Mfk has only stopped because he got to 20.

And if you want just one positive reason for supporting Holland (can’t think why you would, hatred being much more fun), they are definitely the most honest people at the whole tournament.  Here’s what Nigel de Jong said about the Luis Suarez handball that eliminated Ghana:

“If I couldn’t reach it with my head then of course I would punch it away from the goal … He was going to anything possible to make sure his team won and I totally understand that.”

Now think about what everyone else, of whatever nationality, said about the Hand of Sod.  No one but the Dutch was prepared to tell it how it is.

They want to win.  They don’t care how they do it.  And they don’t care who knows it; they’re not going to pretend.  Honesty may not be the best policy, but when compared to all the hypocrisy and cant that surrounds the World Cup finals, don’t you find it refreshing?

Go on.  Rummage through your closet and find something orange to wear.  A tea cosy will do.  The Dutch don’t care.

Bad Losers

Most of us are pleased that a new name will be inscribed on the World Cup tonight.  Fans around the world have always been generous in their praise of Brazilian, Argentinian, even German and Italian football but – just as the failure of Ronaldo, Rooney, Torres et al has opened a window through which the fresh breeze of Mezut Ozil, Diego Forlan (OK – not that fresh), Asamoah Gyan, Kevin-Prince Boateng, David Villa, Thomas Muller, and many others has been able to blow – so we are refreshed by the traditional hegemony of World Cup winners being shaken up.  It’s a shame one of the finalists isn’t African – or Asian – because after all, when you think about it, not so very much has changed, but it has to be a good thing that it’s someone new, even if the contenders are two well-established European powers.

So who isn’t pleased?  The answer is Brazil and Argentina, both of whom feel the trophy is theirs by natural right.  Maradona has said he hasn’t the heart to watch the rest of the competition – understandable, but mean-spirited and churlish.  He would have expected everyone to watch and applaud if his own team were in the final.  The Sepp for Worst Loser, however, will probably be awarded to President Lula da Silva of Brazil.  Asked by a Brazilian journalist for his thoughts on the final, and whether he was planning on watching it with Brazil not involved, Lula said “neither I nor you” want to watch it.

This is nationalism, not patriotism.  It is as narrow of soul as Rupert Murdoch’s  Times, that stopped providing its World Cup supplement at the quarter-final stage in 2006, just as the tournament was getting to the interesting bit – because England had been eliminated so of course the World Cup was over.   Yes, Lula – you are as contemptible as the London tabloids and as interested in the human spirit as Rupert Murdoch.  And your crime is the darkest of all contenders for Worst Loser, for you represent your country – you even presume to tell your countrymen that they are as uninterested (why do so many morons these days think the word is disinterested?) in the final as is your own xenophobic apology for a personality.

Mfk likes to think that all Brazilians are not like Lula, for if they’re not going to watch the final their country has no moral right to retain a single one of its many, many titles.  ‘To them that have, more shall be given’ was never an attractive approach to life.

Clash of the Shite Ones

Mfk noted in 2006 that he had not watched the third place play-off since 1974 (Poland won) because it is basically a ritual humiliation of the losers.  There’s nothing worse than losing in a semi-final, and being forced to play again just so that Fifa can make money is cruel.  Besides, who cares whether you come third or fourth?  As no one does, the players usually can’t be arsed and it’s a crap game.

Last night, however, mfk noticed that several of the players involved stood a chance of winning the golden boot for most goals scored at the tournament – so he broke the habit of 36 years on the basis that they might be giving it a go.

Good call, as you will agree if you watched it.  Possibly because they were more relaxed, with little price to pay for losing, as well as because individuals on both sides really, really wanted to score to win the golden slipper – a fitting metaphor for a Cinderella game  – they really went for it.  It was exciting, wasn’t it?  And what an ultimately thrilling last kick.

Further entertainment came from the very vocal booing of ‘Hand of Sod’ Luis Suarez every time he touched the ball – and if you thought that was unseemly, you definitely don’t get football.  It pissed off the Uruguayans though, so Diego Forlan decided on the nuclear option.  In the 53rd minute, standing directly in front of the loudest-booing section of the stadium, he deliberately, and with malice aforethought, removed the knicker elastic restraining his hair.  It was the ultimate sanction, and undoubtedly contravened the Geneva Convention.

Of course most of us were watching at home via a TV screen, which is as good as watching the reflection in a polished shield, so – while horrified – we were unscathed.  But the Suarez-baiters themselves who were actually present must – literally – have been petrified.  Certainly the booing was much more muted after that.  One wonders what they did afterwards with all those stone statues of African football fans in the act of enjoying a good boo.  Keep your eye on ebay and you might pick one up.

Is the World Cup over in America?

Maybe someone will tell us the viewing figure in Brazil, though mfk is actually more interested in the US viewing figure.  6 million Americans watched USA’s thrilling late winner against Algeria.  20 million watched the thrilling defeat to Ghana.

What were the motives of those extra 14 million?

Was it nationalism?  Did they tune in to watch an American victory, switch off in disgust and vow never again to waste their time on third world* sports like “soccer” – because what’s the point if USA doesn’t win?

* It is not ‘PC’ in the US, unless you are a right wing shock jock or a member of the deeply intellectual and caring ‘tea party’ movement,  to say third world.  This is not for the very good reason that the concept of the three worlds is French and therefore (naturellement) Eurocentric, because Americans seem not to know that.  They interpret first, second, third as a hierarchy  – not as concentric circles – which makes USA (of course) the first world.  It doesn’t occur to them that, in Alfred Sauvy’s 1952 three worlds construction, USA – like Brazil and Australia – is part of the second world; some might suggest that it couldn’t occur to them.  What you have to say instead of third world is developing world.  This actually seems more objectionable.  It implies that the USA, alone among civilisations, is developed, while others can only aspire to its state of human perfection.  It’s a nice idea – Rousseau and other believers in the perfectability of man would have liked it as a concept – but it’s not a very nice thing to think.

Was it event snobbery – the sense of missing something everyone else was watching?  Mfk met many US event snobs at 1994 World Cup finals matches.  In some cases (and there is nothing in principle wrong with this) a World Cup semi-final was the first football match they had ever attended.  They didn’t contribute to the atmosphere, and they didn’t really understand what they were watching – indeed, many found it hard to concentrate on something their eye wasn’t used to and where the action didn’t stop every ten or twenty seconds for a beer and nachos break.  But they all seemed to like being there and to be having a good time – and they were very friendly to people like mfk who were emotionally invested in the game.  At the end of the Germany-Bulgaria quarter-final (mfk was wearing Bulgaria colours) several people wrung him by the hand and told him they thought it was just wonderful what his small country had achieved.  Most of them, mfk felt, would go on to watch more football in future, and good luck to them.  A minority remarked that the USA was the only country with the ‘first world’ organisational capacity to host events of this nature, and suggested that the World Cup finals should always be in the USA.  Even when they dazzle you with their likeability, there is an element in the American psyche that too many Americans haven’t the sense to keep quiet about.

Or did they tune in to USA-Ghana  because they heard how exciting the USA-Algeria game was?  And if so, did they understand – as Landon Donovan seemed to – why football is so compulsive?  Did Ghana’s victory turn them off?  Or did the emotional commitment required in a partial spectator (as spectators should always be) make them get it?  True football fans can never forget their team’s greatest victories, however long they live, but they can equally never forget the narrowest defeats.  England fans, to take the handiest example because mfk lives so close to that country, are tedious to the point of nausea in the way they cling on to England’s 1966 triumph, but if you really want to stir emotion in an Englishman, mention the 1990 semi-final defeat to Germany.  They will not get angry with you.  Instead, they will weep tears of pride.

The viewing figure for the Final in the USA would start to answer these questions.  Mfk would like to think it will go up from 20 million to 30 – or at least stay steady at 20.  Yes, mfk is a cynic; yes, mfk doesn’t really expect this result;  but mfk has lived in the USA and has faith in the niceness and goodwill of most Americans.  It’s the easiest country in the world to criticise if you don’t live there – while lack of information on (or interest in) everywhere else makes it almost impossible to criticise if you do live there.  The USA’s greatest virtue is optimism, so mfk is optimistic for it.

Hatred is the new love

Mfk has already explained this important principle.  In the context of football, hatred is good.

Thus mfk was happy to read in today’s Observer about another aspect of current emotion in Brazil, beyond Lula.  Yes, mfk will continue to attribute this source – as one always should – even though the Observer has gone today for an unattributed rip-off of the Sepp awards.  From the Sepp-imitating  section of the newspaper – Worst Team, Best Fans, Worst Mental Scar, etc. – derivative and, frankly, far inferior – mfk plucks forth the single useful item to pass on to you.

Under ‘Best Headline’ we find a definitely non-best German headline (apparently chosen for typically English anti-German reasons – and it would take the English to claim schadenfreude, as the Observer does, because the Germans only came third when the plucky English came … er, where was it?), but then, after some tired imitation of someone else more original’s style (also without attribution), comes the useful bit.

Mfk was very glad to learn that, following Argentina’s 4-0 defeat to Germany, Brazil’s Globo Esporte ran with the headline:

HAHAHAHAHAHAHA”.

Posted in Brazil, England, Holland, Spain, Uruguay, USA, World Cup | Leave a comment